A note from the future
This site represents things that I, Matt Dragon, though worthy of posting to the internet to be publicly consumed
from age 18-27. Many of those things were, and are, wrong. I used words here at the time I hadn't bothered to educate
myself about the harms of. The fact they were more widely used then doesn't absolve my use of them. Many of my
opinions reek of what I now understand to be white male privilege.
But I'm not going to take those posts or this site down. For one because it wouldn't matter, the internet is forever
and people would still be able to find it. But also because it's important to acknowledge that people should and do
change over time. Merely changing doesn't reverse the wrongs or forgive us of what we said or did before. But the
actions we take in response to those personal changes should be evaluated to see if they can offset at least some of
the harms we caused. I no longer believe people are beyond redemption if they put in the work and the communities
their prior words or acts hurt decide to accept their help going forward.
Taking this down entirely wouldn't address the harms nor hold me accountable. So instead I'm adding this note and
asking people to evaluate for themselves if they think that 2021 Matt has done enough to offset 2010 Matt. To be honest,
these were not my worst takes. Around this time I also stated less publicly that when people run from the police they
should hit them with their cars to catch them. If you run you must have done something, right? I had an argument with
someone about how no one who wasn't guilty would ever confess to a crime. (Sorry random dude in MegaBYTES)
Obviously those takes were bad, uninformed, and I was wrong for voicing then at the time.
I share them because I feel they represent how easy it was to feel empowered as a white male teenager and young
adult despite knowing almost nothing. I share them because I think they represent the rock bottom of my opinions and show how much someone's thoughts can
change when you simply seek out first hand knowledge and then listen.
Those are just terrible opinions I can remember right now. I'm sure there were others. I haven't exhaustively
read all the posts here so there may be similar or worse things I said here. But today, I'm writing letters to
the editor about the need for civilian oversight over jails and the police and advocating for the police to be
taken out of traffic enforcement. I'm speaking at County Commissioners meetings about civilian jail oversight
and the need for accountability. I'm constantly trying to unlearn my bad habits and challenge my initial responses
to things. Not because the world has changed but because I have learned to listen. Because people took the risk,
the time, and the emotional effort to share and luckily I realized I needed to hear them.
So I leave this up, with this now lengthy disclaimer to try to push folks reading my bad takes to also learn to listen,
and to be explicit, not always and only listen to white dudes like me. Where I'm at now, I'm trying to lift other voices.
Folks actually experiencing the struggles I have ideas about trying to lessen or solve. Folks who's opinions I trust not
because they have degrees or status, but because they're talking about their community, their friends, their family, their life, their struggles.
For some of my later posts elsewhere, I chose to channel Dennis Miller when naming that blog. That
decision didn't age any better than he did. He's now a racist bigot or at least he is publicly, maybe he always was. He's probably beyond
redemption at this point. Andrew Gutmann is probably beyond
redemption too, but it's honestly not my decision. I think people definitely can change, and they can change for better or for worse.
So I've done some more recent writing elsewhere that, if you want to read it, is definitely more informed,
less self absorbed,
with fewer blind spots, and just generally better all around.
My whiteness and maleness have given me all the second, third, and fourth chances anyone could ever ask for. It's up to me to prove I've
changed for the better. Hopefully this is a step in that direction.
posted 06/17/2009 12:50:38 by matt
Both teams in this year’s Stanley Cup final played so skillfully and cleanly that the referees “didn’t have to get involved a lot,” Bill McCreary, the veteran referee who worked Game 7 and three other games of the series, said Tuesday.
“We didn’t interfere with the players,” McCreary said.
It's true, they didn't interfere with the players, they just let the players interfere with each other to the level that approaches inappropriate amounts of touching in several of the more conservative states in the Union. However, I agree 100%, Henrik Zetterburg is a very skilled
player. Oh wait, sorry I got Zetterburg and Scuderi confused there for a minute. Scuderi made several great, legal, plays in the crease to save the Penguins season. Zetterburg made several questionable, blatantly illegal plays in the crease to facilitate Detroit making it one win away from another Cup, all with Billy MC standing there staring right at him. I think one of the biggest off-season stories for the Wings will be who's going to get the start in goal next year. Osgood obviously has the resume, but Zetterburg apparently can't contain his desire to grab and cover the puck in the crease. McCreary is the Dick Cheney of hockey. Fuck everything up and then come out later and talk about how you think you did a great job and how doing anything different would mean certain doom.
I know that he probably had orders from on high to call the games differently, but if it's your last Finals you owe it to yourself to call it by the book, it's not like there can be any blow back. At the very least don't come out afterward and continue to be the league mouthpiece. Can the refs get fined for criticizing the officiating? When the coaches do it they can be fined seemingly any amount, though $10,000 seems a popular number. Yet when a player gets fined for something that was illegal on the ice but short of a suspension their fine is capped at $2,500. Way to go NHL, you fine the coaches more for saying what everyone is already thinking, than you do the players for breaking the rules in such a blatant and dangerous fashion that a penalty alone is not enough punishment. Mr. Bettman has obviously never heard this quote before, so I'll present it to him here:
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently. - Friedrich Nietzsche
Every time a player or coach criticizes the officials the NHL should donate $100 of it's money to a charity of the officials choosing. The number of complaints about the officiating should be tracked as an official statistic by the league, and the leader at the end of the year should be given the "Matt Dragon Award" represented by a giant middle finger attached to an arm wearing an orange arm band:
The most criticized official would win the "Bill McCreary Award" which would just be a giant mustache also wearing an orange arm band:
new comments are disabled...